Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations for malaria in infants of < 5 kg body weight (BW) are not evidence-based. Due to pharmacokinetic characteristics of this population, weight-based dose adjustments for antimalarials may be suboptimal. The 20 mg artemether:120 mg lumefantrine dispersible tablet, even with dose adjustment, may lead to artemether over-exposure and reduced lumefantrine exposure in patients < 5 kg. PBPK modelling predicted that a 1:12 artemether:lumefantrine ratio dispersible tablet should match efficacious and safe drug exposures in patients 5- < 15 kg treated with the current artemether-lumefantrine dispersible tablet: the CALINA study used an exposure-matching approach to confirm that drug exposures were comparable. METHODS: contained the LS mean value from historical data (101 ng/mL). PCR-corrected and uncorrected ACPR at Days 15, 29 and 43 and parasite clearance time were evaluated. Adverse events, laboratory evaluations, and developmental assessments were performed. RESULTS: were comparable to historical data. PCR-corrected Day 29 ACPR was 95.5% and 100% in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Treatment was well-tolerated. Developmental assessments at 12 months of age were within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: The optimized dose of artemether-lumefantrine (5 mg/60 mg) achieves the exposures required for optimal efficacy and safety in patients < 5 kg body weight with P. falciparum malaria, consistent with those in patients 5- < 15 kg treated with the current dispersible tablet (20 mg/120 mg). TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04300309.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wounounou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: