Key result
Internet delivery of PCIT during the COVID-19 pandemic improved child behavioral outcomes at similar rates to standard in-person PCIT prior to the pandemic (p > 0.05).
Why the study?
While internet delivery of PCIT was effective during non-pandemic times, whether the added stresses of COVID-19 negatively impacted its effectiveness was unknown.
Does internet delivery of PCIT (I-PCIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic improve treatment outcomes similarly to in-person PCIT prior to the pandemic in families with children experiencing mental and behavioral health disorders?
Cohort
Does internet delivery of PCIT (I-PCIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic improve treatment outcomes similarly to in-person PCIT prior to the pandemic in families with children experiencing mental and behavioral health disorders?
p-value: p=> .05
Internet-delivered Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (I-PCIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic is as effective as in-person PCIT delivered prior to the pandemic, supporting the continued use of telehealth for behavioral health services.
May support I-PCIT access during COVID restrictions; leaves open efficacy versus in-person care in routine settings.
Introduction COVID-19 has led to increased stress for children and families worldwide, increasing and exacerbating the emotional and functional impact of mental and behavioral health disorders. Fortunately, telehealth offers a psychological service delivery option for treating mental and behavioral health disorders when in-person services may not be plausible or preferred. During non-pandemic times, internet delivery of PCIT (I-PCIT) has been shown to be similarly effective as standard PCIT delivered in clinic. However, the added stresses of a pandemic may negatively impact the effectiveness of I-PCIT.Methods Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes, using the ECBI, in families receiving in-person PCIT prior to the pandemic to families who participated in I-PCIT during COVID-19.Results Preliminary data found that the treatment was successful regardless of delivery method (t = –13.84, p < .001) and that children receiving I-PCIT during the pandemic improved at similar rates to those receiving standard PCIT prior to COVID-19 (t = 1.34, p > .05). Additionally, caregivers acquired CDI skills at similar rates regardless of the delivery method (t = -1.15, p > .05).Discussion Despite concerns of increased parental stress and child behavioral challenges during the pandemic, I-PCIT remains an effective, robust treatment program. This promising effectiveness data, coupled with caregiver report of increased accessibility, highlights the unique strengths of telehealth services. Perhaps one of the silver linings of the pandemic is the reduction in barriers to treatment made possible by telehealth, emphasizing the need for behavioral health services to continue to incorporate internet delivery beyond pandemic times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tannenbaum et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Mental and behavioral health disorders. Internet delivery of PCIT (I-PCIT) vs. In-person PCIT prior to the pandemic was evaluated on Treatment outcomes using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) (p=> .05). Internet delivery of PCIT during the COVID-19 pandemic improved child behavioral outcomes at similar rates to standard in-person PCIT prior to the pandemic (p > 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: