Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since producing our first whole-body nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) line-scan images some two years ago (Mansfield et al., 1978), we have made a number of changes to our imaging machine which have made possible a considerable improvement in picture quality together with a substantial reduction in imaging time. Other approaches to NMR imaging are extensively discussed and reviewed elsewhere (Mansfield, 1976; Brunner and Ernst, 1979; Mansfield and Morris, 1981). The present technique utilizes a selective radio-frequency pulse and switched magnetic field selection gradient (Mansfield et al., 1976) used initially to define a thin slice through the specimen. The excited plane of nuclear spins arising from the distribution of protons in the tissues produces a transient signal in a second “read” gradient. This signal is Fourier transformed to give the projection of the total spin distribution in a direction orthogonal to the read gradient. Successive projections produced by mechanically rotating the read gradient are subsequently formed into a two-dimensional picture array using a filtered back projection algorithm (Brooks and di Chiro, 1976). This technique is the NMR analogue of the successful X-ray tomographic technique developed by Hounsfield (1973). In the present images, the slice thickness was set to a nominal 2.0 cm, but it can be varied as required. The imaging time was 9.5 minutes with a pulse repetition period of 0.32 seconds and an average of 16 shots per projection. The NMR operating frequency was 4.0 MHz corresponding to a static magnetic field of 950 G.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bangert et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: