This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether split-bolus whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) provides sufficient cervicocerebral arterial opacification and diagnostic evaluability for vascular assessment in polytrauma compared with dedicated neuroradiological computed tomography angiography (CTA). METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre study, 130 polytrauma patients undergoing split-bolus WBCT were age- and sex-matched to 130 patients undergoing dedicated head-and-neck CTA between January 2023 and June 2025. Arterial attenuation was measured in 15 cervicocerebral segments. Adequate vessel opacification was defined as ≥ 250 HU. Five radiologists independently assessed arterial contrast, venous contamination, overall image quality, and diagnostic evaluability. Statistical analysis included unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Fisher's exact tests with multiple-comparison correction. RESULTS: 260 patients were included (mean age 56.3 ± 24 years; 90 female). Dedicated CTA demonstrated significantly higher attenuation in all segments except the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) (p = 0.08). Mean and median attenuation exceeded 250 HU in all segments for both protocols. Measurements <250 HU were more frequent with split-bolus WBCT, reaching significance only in the petrous ICA (p = 0.02). Subjectively, dedicated CTA showed higher arterial contrast and less venous contamination (both p < 0.01), whereas overall image quality varied across readers. Diagnostic evaluability was high in both cohorts, with no significant differences in four of five readers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower arterial enhancement, split-bolus WBCT provided adequate cervicocerebral arterial opacification and high diagnostic evaluability, supporting feasibility for initial vascular assessment in polytrauma. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The findings support the feasibility of split-bolus WBCT for initial cervicocerebral vascular assessment in polytrauma patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shalamberidze et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: