Key result
Enrollment in a dedicated IVC filter retrieval clinic is linked to a ~63% retrieval rate.
Why the study?
IVC filter placement carries long-term risks that can be mitigated by early retrieval, and a dedicated clinic offers a potential means to ensure follow-up and retrieval.
Does automatic enrollment into a dedicated IVC filter retrieval clinic improve retrieval rates and follow-up in patients with IVC filters?
Observational (n=70)
No
Does automatic enrollment into a dedicated IVC filter retrieval clinic improve retrieval rates and follow-up in patients with IVC filters?
Implementation of a dedicated IVC filter retrieval clinic with automatic enrollment and quarterly follow-up resulted in a 62.9% retrieval rate and 91.7% technical success.
Dedicated IVC filter clinics may boost retrieval rates; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement still plays an essential role in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. However, IVC filter placement does have long-term risks which may be mitigated by retrieving them as soon as clinically acceptable. A dedicated IVC filter clinic provides a potential means of assuring adequate follow-up and retrieval. AIM: To assess the efficacy of our Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval clinic at improving the rate of patient follow-up, effective filter management, and retrieval rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period of August 2017 through July 2018, 70 IVC filters were placed at our institution, and these patients were automatically enrolled into our IVC filter retrieval clinic for quarterly follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed data including appropriateness for removal at 3 months, overall retrieval rates, removal technique(s) employed, and technical success. RESULTS: 62.9% of the potentially retrievable filters were removed during the study period. The technical success of extraction, using a combination of standard and advanced techniques, was 91.7%. Overall, 15% of the patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our findings add to the growing body of literature to support the need for a robust IVC filter retrieval clinic to ensure adequate follow-up and timely retrieval of IVC filters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuchardt et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement (n=70). IVC filter retrieval clinic was evaluated on Retrieval rate of potentially retrievable filters. Enrollment in a dedicated IVC filter retrieval clinic resulted in a 62.9% retrieval rate for potentially retrievable filters and a 91.7% technical success rate for extraction.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: