Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry and multispectral imaging are increasingly used in cultural heritage documentation, but the interpretation of spectral products remains challenging when no independent radiometric calibration or exhaustive field validation is available. This paper presents an annotation-guided, multi-scale UAV workflow for the spectral mapping and characterisation of the ruined Sant Miquel Hermitage in Corbera, Valencia, Spain. Red-Green-Blue (RGB) and four-band multispectral data acquired with a DJI Mavic 3M and processed in DJI Terra are used as scene-relative contrast layers. The workflow is applied at two complementary scales. At the landscape scale, manual annotations of visible masonry are used to generate reference masks for index ranking. The analysis therefore evaluates the ability to discriminate known visible fabric rather than the independent detection of previously unknown archaeological features. At the façade scale, seven annotated material and construction zones are analysed using RGB chromatic indices, multispectral indices, and Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture features. The results show that composite indices combining brightness, vegetation absence, and microrelief provide the most robust discrimination of visible masonry. Among single spectral indices, vegetation-based contrasts remain highly effective, but new non-vegetation-based formulations based on visible/NIR balance provide an interpretable alternative linked to the spectral behaviour of exposed mineral surfaces. At the façade scale, RGB-derived brightness, greenness, redness, and colouration indices are more informative than multispectral vegetation indices for material discrimination, while GLCM texture adds an independent axis for distinguishing dressed stone, rammed earth, and weathered surfaces. The study demonstrates that commercial UAV datasets can support reproducible heritage interpretation when combined with explicit annotation, comparative index ranking, and careful treatment of uncertainty. Rather than claiming a detection capability equivalent to excavation, the workflow provides a transparent framework for mapping visible masonry, characterising façade materials, and identifying surface anomalies that merit targeted field verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montalban-Faet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: