Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Pharmacists can contribute to improve prevention and management of patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to describe pharmacist interventions in drug-related problems (DRPs), medication optimization, and patient management. Methods: The pharmaceutical process allows obtaining exhaustive list of usual patient treatment, patient education, and telephonic follow-up at home. During pharmacy consultation and telephonic follow-up, the number and type of pharmacist interventions were collected and classified into 3 categories: DRPs, medication optimization, and patient management. During telephonic follow-up, pharmacists detected adverse events. Results: From February 2016 to May 2020, 224 pharmacy consultations were conducted. A total of 508 pharmacist interventions (248 for pharmacy consultation and 260 for telephonic follow-up) were conducted, with an average of 2.3 pharmacist interventions per patient. Pharmacist interventions were 44.4% for patient management, 29.6% for DRPs, and 26.0% for medication optimization. After pharmacy consultation, 36.2% of patients' usual treatments were amended. Two hundred thirteen adverse events (AEs) were reported, and 38.8% of patients had one or more AEs. AEs detected were 15 for temporary discontinuation of oral anticancer drugs, 25 for emergency consultations, and 3 for hospitalizations. Conclusion: Pharmacy consultation has shown that pharmacists can contribute to optimize medicinal care for patients with cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clou et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: