This article is concerned with the optimal control problem for the linear stochastic system Xₜ=x+∫₀ᵗ(AₛXₛ+Bₛuₛ+fₛ)\, ds+∫₀ᵗ∑ᵢ₌₁ᵈ[Cᵢ(s)Xₛ+Dᵢ(s)uₛ+gᵢ(s)]\, dwᵢ(s) with the convex risk functional J(u)=EM(XT)+E∫₀TG(t, Xₜ,uₜ)\, dt. In order to guarantee the existence of an optimal control without any (weak) compactness assumption on the admissible control set, we assume that the risk function M is coercive and that ∑ᵢ₌₁ᵈDᵢ^*Dᵢ is uniformly positive, rather than to assume like in the control literature that the running risk function G is coercive with respect to the control variable. In this new setting, the running risk function G may be independent of the control variable, and therefore the so-called singular linear-quadratic (LQ) stochastic control problem is included. A rigorous theory is developed for the general stochastic LQ problem with random coefficients, and the bounded mean oscillation--martingale theory is used to account for the concerned integrability. It plays a crucial role in the following exposition: (a) to connect the stochastic LQ problem to two associated backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs)---one is an n × n symmetric matrix-valued nonlinear Riccati BSDE and the other is an n-dimensional linear BSDE with unbounded coefficients; (b) to show that the latter BSDE has an adapted solution pair of the suitably necessary regularity. This seems to be the first application in a stochastic LQ theory of the BMO-martingale theory, which roots in harmonic analysis. Furthermore, with the help of an a priori estimate on the risk functional, existence and uniqueness of the solutions of backward stochastic Riccati differential equations (BSRDEs) in the singular case is reduced to the regular case via a perturbation method, and then a new existence and uniqueness result on BSRDEs is obtained for the singular case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kohlmann et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: