Key result
Constant atrial pacing augments AV interval step response to sympathetic stimulation by ~48% versus no pacing.
Why the study?
Does sympathetic stimulation affect atrioventricular conduction time and heart period similarly in anesthetized cats?
Does sympathetic stimulation affect atrioventricular conduction time and heart period similarly in anesthetized cats?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.86% vs -0.58%
p-value: p=<0.05
The dynamic characteristics of sympathetic control are similar between heart period and AV conduction time, which may be critical for preventing reentrant tachycardia.
Pacing augments sympathetic AV interval response in cats; extends autonomic physiology data but leaves open human arrhythmia relevance.
Although power spectra of R-R and P-R intervals in response to random respiration show similar frequency distributions, the way in which dynamic sympathetic regulation contributes to such similarity remains unknown. We estimated the transfer function from sympathetic stimulation to the atrioventricular interval (AV conduction time; T(AV)) with and without constant atrial pacing in seven anesthetized cats. The transfer function from sympathetic stimulation to T(AV), except for absolute gain values, approximated a low-pass filter similar to that from sympathetic stimulation to the A-A interval (heart period; T(AA)). The 90%-rise times did not differ between the T(AA) and T(AV) step responses (32.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 29.6 +/- 3.2 s). Constant pacing augmented the T(AV) step response (-0.58 +/- 0.10 vs. -0.86 +/- 0.12 ms/Hz, P < 0.05) without affecting the 90%-rise time. These findings suggest that the dynamic characteristics of sympathetic control are similar between T(AA) and T(AV) despite the different electrophysiological mechanisms determining T(AA) and T(AV). A numerical simulation indicated that if the dynamic characteristics of the sympathetic control do not match between T(AA) and T(AV), a critical condition for initiation of reentrant tachycardia would be encountered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawada et al. (2001) studied this question. Constant atrial pacing vs. Without constant atrial pacing was evaluated on Atrioventricular interval (T(AV)) step response (ms/Hz) (p=<0.05). Constant atrial pacing augmented the atrioventricular interval step response to sympathetic stimulation compared to no pacing (-0.86 vs -0.58 ms/Hz, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: