Key result
A 15 mmHg nocturnal BP fall on ABPM provides moderate diagnostic accuracy for secondary hypertension.
Why the study?
The accuracy of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using night-time and daytime values for diagnosing secondary hypertension was uncertain.
Does 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring accurately diagnose secondary hypertension in referred hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=402)
Does 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring accurately diagnose secondary hypertension in referred hypertensive patients?
A blunted nocturnal blood pressure fall on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring has a high negative predictive value, making it useful for excluding secondary hypertension.
Modest accuracy of nocturnal BP fall limits diagnostic utility; leaves open its value for excluding secondary hypertension in referred patients.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, using the relationship between night-time and daytime values, in diagnosing secondary hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed in a referred population of 402 hypertensive patients (clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg). The ambulatory monitoring data included 24-h mean, awake (daytime) and sleeping (night-time) values. Secondary hypertension was diagnosed by standard procedures. To describe the accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, receiver-operator characteristic curves were constructed, using sensitivity and specificity values for deciles of the distribution of overnight blood pressure falls (absolute and percentage). Measurements included the fall in nocturnal blood pressure, sensitivity (the percentage of those with secondary hypertension who were classified as non-dippers), specificity (the percentage of non-secondary hypertensives who were classified as dippers) and predictive values of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: On average, overnight systolic/diastolic blood pressure fell in primary hypertensives (n = 290) by 20/18 mmHg (13%/19%), in white-coat hypertensives (n = 65, daytime ambulatory blood pressure <135/87 mmHg) by 17/15 mmHg (13%/19%) and in patients with secondary hypertension (n = 47, renal/renovascular and endocrine forms) by 13/11 mmHg (9%/12%). From receiver-operator characteristic curves, the nocturnal blood pressure fall of 15 mmHg showed the highest accuracy, with a sensitivity/specificity of 61%/69% (systolic) and 75%/62% (diastolic) whereas 10% (systolic) and 15% (diastolic) nocturnal falls had a sensitivity/specificity of 62%/74% (systolic) and 62%/70% (diastolic). The ambulatory blood pressure data had a high (>93%) negative predictive value for secondary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary hypertension is associated with a blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data are not critically important for the diagnosis and screening of secondary hypertension but may be helpful in excluding it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1995 study conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=402). 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Standard diagnostic procedures was evaluated on Accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for diagnosing secondary hypertension. A nocturnal systolic/diastolic blood pressure fall of 15 mmHg on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring had a sensitivity/specificity of 61%/69% and 75%/62% for diagnosing secondary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: