Key result
Contrast media inhibit in vitro platelet aggregation versus saline, with diatrizoate showing the strongest effect.
Why the study?
Platelet adhesion/aggregation at coronary artery stenosis is strongly modulated by local shear rates and endothelial function, but the impact of ionic versus nonionic contrast media on this process is unclear.
Does the use of nonionic vs. ionic contrast media affect platelet adhesion/aggregation at a stenosis site in an in vitro model?
Does the use of nonionic vs. ionic contrast media affect platelet adhesion/aggregation at a stenosis site in an in vitro model?
In an in vitro model of coronary stenosis, simulated bolus administration of contrast media showed no clear benefit of ionic over nonionic contrast media in inhibiting platelet aggregation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support preferring ionic over nonionic contrast for antiplatelet effects; leaves open whether in vitro findings translate to patients.
Platelet adhesion/aggregation (PAA) at a site of coronary artery stenosis is believed to be a process strongly modulated by local shear rates and the functional state of neighboring endothelium. One purpose of the present work, therefore, is to describe an in vitro model for the direct imaging of such PAA. Another is to apply the model to the question as to whether the use of nonionic vs. ionic contrast media (CM) in the presence of vascular endothelium contributes to PAA at the stenosis site. Toward these ends, we utilized a special flow chamber which incorporates a monolayer of endothelial cells (ECs), a step 66% flowpath constriction at a site preadsorbed with microfibrillar collagen, and arterial shear rates. By epifluorescence microscopy and digital image analysis of video recordings, PAA was found to be greater with dysfunctional ECs (pretreated with lysine acetylsalicyclate) than with normal ECs, thereby confirming a modulatory role in PAA of functionally intact ECs. When nonionic (iohexol) or ionic (ioxaglate, diatrizoate) CM was added to the flowing blood at a concentration of 20% by non-red cell volume, PAA was inhibited in the order diatrizoate > ioxaglate > iohexol > saline control. No inhibition by any CM was seen, however, when chamber prefill culture medium containing 20% by volume CM was displaced by CM-free blood, in simulation of bolus administration of CM. In terms of inhibition of PAA during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), therefore, our model provides a conceptual basis by which one may anticipate in flowing blood no clear benefit of ionic over nonionic CM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grabowski et al. (1993) studied Coronary artery stenosis (in vitro model). Nonionic vs ionic contrast media vs. Saline control was evaluated on Platelet adhesion/aggregation (PAA). In an in vitro model of coronary artery stenosis, platelet adhesion/aggregation was inhibited by contrast media in the order diatrizoate > ioxaglate > iohexol > saline control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: