Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use first-principles calculations to clarify the origin of the visible light absorption in chalcogen element-doped TiO 2 . Our results show that interstitial doping is not the origin of visible light absorption under any equilibrium growth conditions, but rather, sensitization is achievable via substitutional doping of O (or Ti) at Ti-rich (or O-rich) conditions, respectively. With increasing atomic number (from S to Te), it is harder to form anion-doped TiO 2 but easier to achieve cationic doping. Both anionic and cationic doping can confer visible light absorption, but the former is more effective. The effect increases with increasing atomic number of the chalcogen element. Dopant pairing is found in anionic S-, Se-, and Te- and cationic S-doped TiO 2 . We further identified that anion pairing induces a bathochromic shift in the absorption, whereas cationic pairing causes the opposite, that is, a hypsochromic (blue) shift, predictions that agree well with the experimental findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: