This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background:Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is the infection of pre-existing ascitic fluid without evidence of a secondary infection. Objective: To evaluate ascitic fluid calprotectin as a diagnostic marker of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on 50 cirrhotic patients with ascites. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group (I):Included40 cirrhotic patients with SBP on the basis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) count in the ascitic fluid ≥250 cells/μLin the absence of secondary peritonitis, irrespective of ascitic fluid culture results, Group (II):Included10 cirrhotic patients with ascites but without SBP (control group). Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the two studied groups regarding hemoglobin (Hb) (P=0.006), white blood cells (WBCs) (P=0.015), platelet count (P>0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (P=0.001) and bilirubin (P=0.013). There was also significant difference between the two studied groups regarding ascitic fluid analysis parameters; as ascitic lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and PMN count were significantly higher in SBP group (P<0.001, for both). Ascitic fluid calprotectin was significantly higher in SBP group compared to non-SBP group (26.3 ng/ml (6.5 – 75) vs. 15 ng/ml (6.5-33); P=0.013). Ascitic calprotectin was significant at a cutoff level of 18 ng/ml with a sensitivity of 90% and 70% specificity for diagnosing SBP with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.835). Conclusion: Ascitic fluid calprotectin could be used to serve as a convenient reliable diagnostic marker for SBP in cirrhotic patients with ascites.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afifi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: