Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: HLA-B*58:01 is associated with allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (sCADR) particularly in Han Chinese, but the risk in European populations has seldom been studied. OBJECTIVE: To study the association of HLA-B*58:01 with allopurinol-induced sCADR in a Portuguese population. METHODS: We studied 25 patients (11 male/14 female, mean age 67·4 years) with sCARD from allopurinol: 19 DRESS (drug reaction eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) and six Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). HLA was genotyped by reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction and results compared statistically with a control group of 23 allopurinol-tolerant individuals and the control population. RESULTS: HLA-B*58:01 was present in 16 patients with sCADR (64%) [12 DRESS (63%), four SJS/TEN (67%)], one allopurinol-tolerant individual (4%) and 63 normal controls (1·96%), with a statistically significant difference between sCADR and the two control groups. When compared with the normal population, HLA-B*58:01 was associated with a higher risk of sCADR, both DRESS [odds ratio (OR) 85·36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 32·52-224·04] and SJS/TEN (OR 99·59, 95% CI 17·91-553·72). There was no statistically different risk between these two types of CADR. CONCLUSIONS: Portuguese patients with sCADR from allopurinol, both DRESS and SJS/TEN, have a high frequency of HLA-B*58:01, with an OR similar to European patients with SJS/TEN. This study also extends this association to DRESS in Europeans. The recommendation to genotype systematically before therapy is controversial, particularly when HLA-B*58:01 prevalence in the normal population is low, as in Europe. However it could be an option for patients with other risks factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalo et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: