Key result
CT-defined sarcopenia linked to ~163% higher one-year mortality after AVR for severe aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
Do frailty-related markers (Clinical Frailty Scale, CONUT score, and CT-based sarcopenia) predict mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=407)
No
Do frailty-related markers (Clinical Frailty Scale, CONUT score, and CT-based sarcopenia) predict mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Hazard Ratio: 2.63 (95% CI 1.22–5.67)
Absolute Event Rate: 15.4% vs 4.1%
p-value: p=0.014
Higher Clinical Frailty Scale scores and CT-based sarcopenia are independently associated with 1-year mortality after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis, providing complementary prognostic value.
Objective: This study investigated the association between multiple frailty-related markers-Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, and computed tomography (CT)-based sarcopenia-and overall survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), with particular emphasis on the first year after AVR. Materials and Methods: A total of 407 patients with severe AS who underwent surgical or transcatheter AVR at a tertiary center between November 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively included.Three frailty-related markers were analyzed: CFS score for functional frailty, CONUT score for nutritional status, and CT-defined sarcopenia for structural muscle depletion.The CONUT score was calculated using serum markers, and sarcopenia was defined according to cohort-specific tertiles of the paravertebral muscle index quantified at the 12th thoracic vertebra (T12) vertebral level using CT.Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the prognostic associations of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and the three frailty-related markers with all-cause mortality after AVR.Results: Within 1 year after AVR, 32 patients (7.9%) died.In the overall multivariable analysis, higher CFS scores and CTdefined sarcopenia were independently associated with mortality, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.38;P < 0.001) and 2.63 (95% CI, 1.22-5.67;P = 0.014), respectively.The STS score and CONUT scores were not associated with survival, with HRs of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.95-1.06;P = 0.883) and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.90-1.22;P = 0.563), respectively.A significant interaction was observed between the CONUT score and sarcopenia.Conclusion: Among patients with severe AS undergoing AVR, higher CFS scores and CT-based sarcopenia were independently associated with survival after adjustment for the STS score.The prognostic association of the CONUT score differed according to sarcopenia status.These findings support the incorporation of functional and structural vulnerabilities into risk assessment for patients undergoing AVR for AS; however, the role of nutritional status requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=407). CT-defined sarcopenia vs. Absence of sarcopenia was evaluated on All-cause mortality within 1 year (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.22-5.67, p=0.014). CT-defined sarcopenia was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 2.63) after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: