Key result
TTE matches TEE for TR severity and GLIDE score but TEE better assesses leaflet number.
Why the study?
It remains unclear whether transthoracic echocardiography alone is sufficient for screening patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation considered for surgical or transcatheter interventions, or whether transesophageal echocardiography is always required.
Does transthoracic echocardiography provide comparable accuracy to transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating the GLIDE score and other parameters in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=42)
Does transthoracic echocardiography provide comparable accuracy to transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating the GLIDE score and other parameters in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation?
p-value: p=>0.05
Transthoracic echocardiography is a reliable first-line screening tool for evaluating the GLIDE score in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation, potentially sparing frail patients from transesophageal echocardiography.
May aid T-TEER candidate selection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background The GLIDE score is a simple five–component scoring system that can be readily obtained during transesophageal echocardiographic imaging and has been shown to predict the likelihood of procedural success with transcatheter tricuspid edge–to–edge repair (T–TEER). Patients with a high GLIDE score (≥4 points) are less likely to benefit from T–TEER and are at increased risk of significant residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, it remains unclear whether transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) alone is sufficient for screening patients considered for transcatheter or surgical interventions, or whether transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is always required. Aim The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two–dimensional (2D) and three–dimensional (3D) echocardiographic parameters, including the GLIDE score, obtained by TTE versus TEE for screening patients with TR who are candidates for surgical or transcatheter intervention. Methods Consecutive patients with symptomatic and significant TR were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent both 2D/3D TTE and 2D/3D TEE on the same day. The GLIDE score was calculated using both imaging modalities. The score is based on five components: septo–lateral coaptation gap, chordal structure density, TR jet location, en–face TR jet morphology, and image quality. Each component was categorized as either straightforward (0 points) or complex (1 point), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Results The study population included 42 patients (25 men and 17 women) with a median age of 79 years. Of these, 52.3% had severe TR, 42.8% massive TR, and 4.7% torrential TR. No statistically significant differences were observed between TTE and TEE in the assessment of TR severity, right ventricular size and function, annular dimensions, coaptation gap, or overall GLIDE score (all p › 0.05). In contrast, leaflet number was more accurately evaluated by TEE (p ‹ 0.001). Table 1 and 2. Conclusions Transthoracic echocardiography represents a reliable tool for the initial screening of patients with significant TR who are candidates for surgical or transcatheter intervention. In particular, the GLIDE score can be effectively applied using transthoracic imaging as a first–line screening method. These findings are especially relevant for elderly and frail patients, who may be spared a transesophageal examination when TTE findings already suggest unfavorable anatomy for intervention.Table 1 Table 2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciaramella et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Symptomatic and significant tricuspid regurgitation (n=42). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Assessment of TR severity, right ventricular size and function, annular dimensions, coaptation gap, overall GLIDE score, and leaflet number (p=>0.05). Transthoracic echocardiography was comparable to transesophageal echocardiography for assessing TR severity and overall GLIDE score (p>0.05), but TEE more accurately evaluated leaflet number (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: