Key result
Age is not linked to early procedural complications after transcatheter ablation for AF.
Why the study?
Does age impact procedural safety and early arrhythmic outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=217)
No
Does age impact procedural safety and early arrhythmic outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Advanced age does not independently influence procedural safety or early arrhythmic outcomes within 48 hours after transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Age not independently tied to early TCA safety or efficacy in selected patients; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
Background Transcatheter ablation (TCA) is an established therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the influence of age on procedural safety and early efficacy remains uncertain, especially in real–world practice. Objective To determine the impact of age on early procedural safety and arrhythmic outcomes after TCA for AF in an unselected real–world cohort. Methods We analysed 217 patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years) who underwent TCA for AF at the Cardiology Unit of Ciriè Hospital (ASL Torino 4, Turin, Italy) between January 2022 and December 2023. Outcomes were assessed across three predefined age cut-offs (‹65, ‹70, and ‹80 years) and with age modelled as a continuous variable. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between age and procedural safety and efficacy endpoints. Primary safety endpoints included a composite of pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, vascular complications, bleeding, stroke, and cardiovascular or all–cause death within 48 hours. Secondary efficacy endpoints consisted of a composite of AF recurrence and AF persistence within 48 hours, with both the composite and its individual components analysed in covariate–adjusted models. Results No significant differences in early complications or arrhythmic outcomes were observed across any age cut-off. In multivariable logistic regression, age was not independently associated with procedural safety (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.93–1.03; p=0.69), AF recurrence (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.97–1.05; p=0.77), or AF persistence (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.96–1.05; p=0.91). Conclusions In this real–world single–center cohort, age did not influence procedural safety or early arrhythmic outcomes after AF ablation. These findings indicate that advanced age alone should not preclude referral for TCA in appropriately selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=217). Age vs. Younger age was evaluated on Composite of pericardial effusion, pericardiocentesis, vascular complications, bleeding, stroke, and cardiovascular or all-cause death within 48 hours (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03, p=0.69). Age was not associated with early procedural safety complications after transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.93-1.03; p=0.69).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: