Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genomewide selection within an A/B biparental cross is most advantageous if it could be effectively done before the cross is phenotyped. Our objectives were to determine if a general combining ability (GCA) model is useful for genomewide selection in an A/B cross, and to assess the influence of training population size ( N GCA ), number of crosses pooled into the training population ( N × ), linkage disequilibrium ( r 2 ), and heritability (h 2 ) on the prediction accuracy with the GCA model. The GCA model involved pooling 4 to 38 maize crosses with A and B as one of the parents into the training population for an A/B cross, whereas the same background (SB) model involved pooling crosses between random inbreds. Across 30 A/B test populations, the mean response to selection (R) with the GCA model was 0.19 Mg ha –1 for testcross grain yield, –6 g kg –1 for moisture, and 0.38 kg hL –1 for test weight. These R values with the GCA model were 68 to 76% of the corresponding R values with phenotypic selection (PS). The R values with the SB model were only 15 to 28% of the R values with PS. Increasing the size of the training population with random crosses from the same heterotic group was less important than including crosses with A and B as one of the parents. Prediction accuracy was most highly correlated with and . Our results indicated that the GCA model is routinely effective for genomewide selection within A/B crosses, before phenotyping the progeny in the cross.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobson et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: