Key result
Three plasma microRNAs discriminate Brugada syndrome from healthy controls with an AUC of ~0.87.
Why the study?
Daily ECG variations challenge Brugada syndrome diagnosis, most patients lack genetic predisposition evidence, and circulating microRNAs may serve as diagnostic biomarkers.
Can plasma microRNAs serve as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for Brugada syndrome?
Case-Control (n=232)
No
Can plasma microRNAs serve as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for Brugada syndrome?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.871
p-value: p=<0.0001
A panel of three plasma microRNAs (hsa-miR-423-3p, hsa-miR-223-3p, and hsa-miR-23a-3p) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for Brugada syndrome, offering a potential noninvasive biomarker approach.
Plasma microRNAs may support noninvasive Brugada syndrome diagnosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) can be diagnosed by a type 1 BrS tracing in a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, there are daily variations in the ECGs of BrS patients, which presents a challenge when diagnosing BrS. Although many susceptibility genes have been identified, the SCN5A gene is reportedly the main causative gene of BrS. However, most patients do not have an evidence of genetic predisposition to develop BrS. In addition, the diagnosis and risk stratification for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with BrS presents some problems. Meanwhile, circulating micro RNAs (miRNAs) have drawn increased attention as potential biomarkers of various diseases. We hypothesize that circulating miRNAs may be potential diagnostic biomarkers for BrS. METHODS: We enrolled 70 Japanese BrS patients and 34 controls for the screening cohort. A total of 2,555 miRNA sequences were detected using the 3D-Gene miRNAs labeling kit and 3D-Gene Human miRNAs Oligo Chip. We compared the expression of the miRNAs between the BrS patients and the controls. We validated whether the miRNA were significantly up- or downregulated in the screening cohort using RT-PCR. We also enrolled 72 Japanese BrS patients and 56 controls to replicate these miRNAs. RESULTS: Eight miRNAs (hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-22-3p, hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-4485-5p, hsa-miR-550a-5p, hsa-miR-423-3p, hsa-miR-23a-3p, and hsa-miR-30d-5p) were downregulated, and one miRNA (hsa-miR-873-3p) was upregulated by more than 3-fold in BrS patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that hsa-miR-423-3p, hsa-miR-223-3p, and hsa-miR-23a-3p were independently associated with BrS (P < 0.0001). The AUC based on cross validation was 0.871 with a sensitivity and specificity of 83.5% and 81.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The plasma miRNAs are potential noninvasive biomarkers of BrS, and the constructed logistic model was useful for discriminating BrS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikeuchi et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Brugada syndrome (n=232). Plasma microRNAs (miR-423-3p, miR-223-3p, and miR-23a-3p) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Discrimination of Brugada syndrome from controls (Area Under the Curve) (AUC 0.871, p=<0.0001). A logistic model combining three plasma microRNAs (miR-423-3p, miR-223-3p, and miR-23a-3p) accurately discriminated patients with Brugada syndrome from healthy controls with an AUC of 0.871.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: