Key result
Transdermal estradiol increases FMD ~29% versus hormone suppression, but adding oral progesterone abolishes this effect.
Why the study?
Very few studies have explored the cardiovascular effects of progesterone in premenopausal women.
Does short-term oral progesterone antagonize the effect of transdermal estradiol on flow-mediated dilation in healthy premenopausal women?
Does short-term oral progesterone antagonize the effect of transdermal estradiol on flow-mediated dilation in healthy premenopausal women?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.14% vs 7.85%
p-value: p=<0.05
Short-term oral micronized progesterone administration antagonizes the beneficial effect of transdermal estradiol on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in young healthy women.
May blunt estrogen's endothelial benefit in premenopausal women; leaves open long-term CV implications and need for larger trials.
Very few studies have explored the cardiovascular effects of progesterone in premenopausal women. This study aimed to examine the short-term effects of oral progesterone alone, transdermal estrogen alone, and progesterone and estrogen combined on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in healthy reproductive-aged women. We suppressed endogenous estrogens and progesterone in 17 premenopausal women for 10-12 days using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. On day 4 (hormone suppression condition), subjects were tested (n = 17) and were then supplemented with either 200 mg micronized progesterone (n = 8) orally or 0.1 mg estradiol (n = 9) transdermally per day. On day 7 (progesterone-first or estradiol-first condition), subjects were tested and began supplementation with both hormones (n = 17) and were tested again on day 10 (combined hormone condition). FMD of the brachial artery was assessed using B-mode arterial ultrasound, combined with synchronized Doppler analysis. As a result, significant differences in FMD were observed between hormone suppression (7.85 ± 1.06%) and estrogen-first conditions (10.14 ± 1.40%; P < 0.05). The estradiol-induced increase was abolished when oral progesterone was also supplemented (6.27 ± 0.96%). In contrast, we observed a trend toward a decrease in FMD with unopposed progesterone administration, but no statistically significant differences were found between the progesterone-first (6.66 ± 1.23%), hormone suppression (7.80 ± 1.23%), and combined hormone conditions (7.40 ± 1.29%). In conclusion, these data suggest that short-term oral micronized progesterone administration antagonizes the beneficial effect of transdermal estradiol on FMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miner et al. (2011) studied Healthy premenopausal women (n=17). Oral micronized progesterone and transdermal estradiol vs. Hormone suppression was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery (p=<0.05). Transdermal estradiol increased flow-mediated dilation compared to hormone suppression (10.14% vs 7.85%, P<0.05), but this increase was abolished with the addition of oral progesterone (6.27%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: