Key result
HRV-based machine learning model predicts healthcare worker burnout with ~84% sensitivity.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic increased stress and burnout among healthcare workers, prompting evaluation of burnout prevalence and development of a predictive machine learning model using heart rate variability.
Can an ECG-based heart rate variability machine learning model accurately detect burnout among healthcare workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,615)
Can an ECG-based heart rate variability machine learning model accurately detect burnout among healthcare workers?
Absolute Event Rate: 20.5% vs 14.9%
An ECG-derived heart rate variability machine learning model can detect burnout among healthcare workers with good sensitivity.
HRV-ML models may aid burnout screening in stressed HCWs; leaves open prospective validation before any clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented increase in rates of stress and burn out among healthcare workers (HCWs). Heart rate variability (HRV) has been shown to be reflective of stress and burnout. The present study evaluated the prevalence of burnout and attempted to develop a HRV based predictive machine learning (ML) model to detect burnout among HCWs during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Mini-Z 1.0 survey was collected from 1615 HCWs, of whom 664, 512 and 439 were frontline, second-line and non-COVID HCWs respectively. Burnout was defined as score ≥3 on Mini-Z-burnout-item. A 12-lead digitized ECG recording was performed and ECG features of HRV were obtained using feature extraction. A ML model comprising demographic and HRV features was developed to detect burnout. RESULTS: Burnout rates were higher among second-line workers 20.5% than frontline 14.9% and non-COVID 13.2% workers. In multivariable analyses, features associated with higher likelihood of burnout were feeling stressed (OR = 6.02), feeling dissatisfied with current job (OR = 5.15), working in a chaotic, hectic environment (OR = 2.09) and feeling that COVID has significantly impacted the mental wellbeing (OR = 6.02). HCWs with burnout had a significantly lower HRV parameters like root mean square of successive RR intervals differences (RMSSD) [p < 0.0001] and standard deviation of the time interval between successive RR intervals (SDNN) [p < 0.001]) as compared to normal subjects. Extra tree classifier was the best performing ML model (sensitivity: 84%) CONCLUSION: In this study of HCWs from India, burnout prevalence was lower than reports from developed nations, and was higher among second-line versus frontline workers. Incorporation of HRV based ML model predicted burnout among HCWs with a good accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in COVID-19 related burnout (n=1,615). Second-line healthcare work vs. Frontline and non-COVID healthcare work was evaluated on Burnout (score ≥3 on Mini-Z-burnout-item). Burnout prevalence was 20.5% in second-line, 14.9% in frontline, and 13.2% in non-COVID healthcare workers; an HRV-based machine learning model predicted burnout with 84% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: