Key result
Cardiovascular risk score demonstrates ~0.67 AUC for diagnosing CHD.
Why the study?
The study was designed to develop and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a cardiovascular risk score for CHD diagnosis in rural China.
Does a cardiovascular risk score accurately diagnose coronary heart disease in patients in rural China?
Cross-Sectional (n=520)
Does a cardiovascular risk score accurately diagnose coronary heart disease in patients in rural China?
A cardiovascular risk score with a cutoff of 4 provides moderate diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.673) for identifying coronary heart disease in rural Chinese patients.
May aid CHD diagnosis in rural China; leaves open need for validation before clinical adoption.
Objective: The current study was to design a cardiovascular risk score for the diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the rural area of China and the sensitivity and specificity of this score would be assessed. Methods: A total of 520 patients were enrolled and based on the results from coronary artery angiography, patients were divided into three groups: CHD group (coronary artery ≥50% stenosis), atherosclerosis group (coronary artery <50% stenosis) and normal groups (without stenosis). Between-group differences were evaluated and the sensitivity and specificity of cardiovascular risk score were evaluated. Results: Compared to the normal and atherosclerosis groups, patients in the CHD group were older, had higher body mass index, and more likely to be smoking and obese, and had dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, and had higher cardiovascular risk score (4.05 ± 2.15 vs 2.94 ± 1.90 vs 2.54 ± 1.59). Patients in the CHD group were more likely to have cardiovascular risk scores ≥2 (90.2% CHD group vs 74.2% atherosclerosis group vs 76.1% normal group, P < 0.05). The area under the ROC was 0.673, with 95% confidence interval was 0.623-0.722 (P < 0.001), and the sensitivity and specificity were highest when the cardiovascular risk score was 4, indicating that the value of cardiovascular risk score of 4 was a good cutoff point for CHD diagnosis. Conclusion: Using cardiovascular risk score can improve CHD diagnosis which may help to reduce health disparities between rural and urban area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=520). Cardiovascular risk score vs. Coronary artery <50% stenosis or no stenosis was evaluated on Diagnosis of coronary heart disease (coronary artery ≥50% stenosis) (AUC 0.673, 95% CI 0.623-0.722, p=< 0.001). A cardiovascular risk score for diagnosing coronary heart disease yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.673 (95% CI 0.623-0.722; P<0.001), with a score of 4 identified as the optimal cutoff.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: