Key result
Baloxavir marboxil linked to ~103% faster fever resolution vs oseltamivir in influenza A.
Why the study?
Data were limited on the efficacy of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir in Chinese patients with influenza A.
Does baloxavir marboxil reduce the duration of fever and symptoms compared to oseltamivir in adults and adolescents with influenza A?
Observational (n=246)
Does baloxavir marboxil reduce the duration of fever and symptoms compared to oseltamivir in adults and adolescents with influenza A?
In a real-world observational study of Chinese patients with influenza A, baloxavir marboxil significantly reduced the duration of fever compared to oseltamivir, though overall symptom duration was similar.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support faster fever resolution with baloxavir in influenza A; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending RCTs.
Introduction There are limited data on the efficacy of baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) versus oseltamivir in Chinese patients with influenza A. Methods This study is an observational real-world investigation encompassing 246 patients (baloxavir, n = 147; oseltamivir, n = 99) confirmed positive for influenza A. The choice between baloxavir and oseltamivir antiviral treatments was determined collaboratively by the clinician and the patient. A thorough comparative analysis was undertaken between the two groups, examining parameters such as the duration of fever and symptoms, viral load dynamics, lymphocyte changes, and enhancements in health-related quality of life (QoL). Results No significant differences were observed in demographic data between the two groups. The duration of fever was significantly shorter in the baloxavir group ( P < 0.001). However, the duration of symptoms was not significant different ( P = 0.167). Multivariable Cox analysis showed the independent factors affecting duration of fever were baloxavir treatment (HR = 2.033, P < 0.001), fever on day 1 (HR = 0.741, P = 0.010) and CRP level (HR = 1.009, P = 0.039). Moreover, sex (HR= 0.660, P = 0.019) and monocyte count (HR = 1.355, P = 0.018) were independent factors affecting the duration of symptoms. No significant difference in change of health-related quality of life ( P > 0.05), positive rate of viral antigen on day 3 ( P = 0.477) between the two groups. Remarkably, a mutation was observed in one case on the third-day after baloxavir treatment compared with first-day, from cysteine to serine at position 384 of the PA subunit. Conclusion In the clinical setting, baloxavir demonstrated comparable clinical benefits to oseltamivir, establishing its efficacy as an effective antiviral therapy for Chinese patients with influenza.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Influenza A (n=246). Baloxavir marboxil vs. Oseltamivir was evaluated on Duration of fever (HR 2.033, p=<0.001). Baloxavir marboxil was associated with a shorter duration of fever compared to oseltamivir in patients with influenza A.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: