Retrospective study shows higher post-treatment radiation doses improve progression-free survival in large liver tumors, indicating post-treatment scans confirm effective therapeutic delivery.
To assess the prognostic value of post-treatment yttrium-90 PET/CT–based dosimetry and an absorbed dose threshold for progression-free survival in large (> 8 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas treated with transarterial radioembolization. Fifty-eight patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent transarterial radioembolization were retrospectively stratified by maximum tumor diameter (≤ 8 cm vs. >8 cm). Tumor absorbed doses were quantified using pre-treatment technetium-99 m macroaggregated albumin single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and post-treatment yttrium-90 PET/CT. Progression-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. Receiver operating characteristic analysis explored a post-treatment dose threshold in large tumors. Patients with tumors ≤ 8 cm had longer progression-free survival than those with tumors > 8 cm ( p = 0.030). Post-treatment dosimetry revealed higher tumor absorbed doses in tumors ≤ 8 cm than in those > 8 cm (median, 1386.1 vs. 515.9 Gy; p < 0.001). In tumors > 8 cm, a delivered dose > 468 Gy was associated with improved progression-free survival ( p = 0.014). Pre-treatment dosimetry correlated with post-treatment doses but was not associated with prognosis. Post-treatment dosimetry suggested that a tumor absorbed dose of approximately 468 Gy may be an exploratory marker of adequate dose delivery in tumors > 8 cm, though this threshold should be interpreted alongside tumor biology, particularly alpha-fetoprotein level, and requires validation. Pre-treatment dosimetry did not reliably predict outcomes, indicating undertreatment risk when relying solely on pre-treatment imaging. Post-treatment imaging may help confirm adequate dose delivery in large hepatocellular carcinomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: