Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study reveals that widening stairs and optimizing pedestrian diversion reduce evacuation times in underground complexes, indicating that local capacity gains can shift bottlenecks...
Underground commercial complexes form a multi-stage evacuation chain linking horizontal transfer, vertical discharge, and exit allocation. Pathfinder simulations examined occupant-profile composition, stair width, corridor configuration, and pedestrian diversion through single-factor and coupled scenarios. Increasing stair width from 1.0 to 1.8 m reduced evacuation time by 39.9–45.7%, while marginal benefits declined beyond approximately 2.4 m. A segmented wide-to-narrow corridor reduced evacuation time from 207 to 119 s (42.5%). Balanced diversion reduced evacuation time by 25.3% in the symmetric layout, whereas the asymmetric optimum assigned 75% of occupants to the nearer exit and achieved a 25.8% reduction. Sequential stair-and-final-exit widening, corridor modification, and diversion reduced coupled-model evacuation time from 274 to 213 s (22.3%). The results support a system-level interpretation in which local capacity expansion can relieve one constraint while transferring the controlling bottleneck to a downstream segment. Because the analyses use prototype geometries under smoke-free conditions, the reported numerical values are model-specific diagnostic responses rather than universal design thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: