Key result
Outpatient ophthalmologic procedures are not linked to increased short-term AMI risk.
Why the study?
Preoperative cardiovascular evaluations are frequently performed before ambulatory ophthalmologic procedures, but whether these procedures can trigger an acute myocardial infarction is unknown.
Does exposure to ophthalmologic procedures increase the short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction in adults aged 40 years and older?
Observational
Yes
Does exposure to ophthalmologic procedures increase the short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction in adults aged 40 years and older?
Outpatient ophthalmologic procedures do not increase the short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction, supporting the safety of these procedures without extensive preoperative cardiovascular evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative cardiovascular evaluations are frequently done before ambulatory ophthalmologic procedures. However, whether these procedures can trigger an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term risk for AMI associated with ophthalmologic procedures. DESIGN: Case-crossover design. SETTING: Population-based nationwide study from Norway and Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: First-time patients with AMI, aged 40 years and older, identified via inpatient registries and linked to outpatient surgical procedures in Norway (2008 to 2014) and Sweden (2001 to 2014), respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Using self-matching, for each participant, exposure to ophthalmologic procedures in the 0 to 7 days before AMI diagnosis (hazard period) was compared with an 8-day period 30 days earlier, that is, days 29 to 36 before AMI (control period) to estimate the relative risk for an AMI the week after an ophthalmologic procedure. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated, using conditional logistic regression. Only patients who had a procedure of interest during either the hazard or control period were included. RESULTS: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91). Furthermore, there was no evidence of increased risk for AMI when analyses were stratified by surgery subtype, anesthesia (local or general), duration, invasiveness (low, intermediate, or high), patient's age (<65 years or ≥65 years), or comorbidity (none vs. any). LIMITATION: Potential bias from time-varying confounders between the hazard and the control periods. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologic procedures done in an outpatient setting did not seem to be associated with an increased risk for AMI. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Swedish Research Council.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sen et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction. Ophthalmologic procedures vs. Control period (days 29 to 36 before AMI) was evaluated on Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.91). Outpatient ophthalmologic procedures were not associated with an increased short-term risk for acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.75-0.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: