Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates dynamic-feasibility-aware virtual inertia coordination maintains frequency security in distribution networks, highlighting the impact of converter dynamics.
Converter-interfaced resources in active distribution networks (ADNs) can provide virtual-inertia support, but inertia coordination based on initial frequency-response metrics, such as the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF) and frequency nadir, may not fully capture dynamic interactions among converters, affecting inertia-setting feasibility. This paper proposes a dynamic-feasibility-aware coordination method for converter-interfaced resources with heterogeneous converter dynamics, considering grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) configurations. Reduced-order dynamic simulation samples are generated to train Gaussian process regression surrogates that learn mappings from inertia settings to initial frequency-support metrics and feasibility indicators, enabling evaluation during optimization. Full-window frequency and voltage security and tail-oscillation behavior are incorporated through feasibility constraints, restricting the search to feasible regions. The nonconvex problem is solved using grid-assisted multi-start sequential least-squares programming. Case studies on a modified United Kingdom Generic Distribution System (UKGDS) EHV1 network show that admissible inertia settings and robustness margins depend strongly on GFM/GFL composition under sensitivity and disturbance tests. In the all-GFM case, the proposed method preserves nearly the same initial frequency support as frequency-performance-oriented optimization while excluding settings that cause sustained oscillations and frequency-limit violations, maintaining the point of common coupling (PCC) frequency within 49.846–50.000 Hz.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: