Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study demonstrates improved muscle tone, joint mobility, and gross motor function in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, indicating benefits of sustained...
Background: Cerebral palsy is associated with complex motor impairments, including spasticity, reduced joint mobility, and functional limitations. Longitudinal data describing changes during sustained rehabilitation remain limited. Objective: We evaluated longitudinal changes in muscle tone, joint mobility, and gross motor function in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy participating in a structured 12-month rehabilitation program. Methods: This prospective, uncontrolled observational study included 94 children aged 5–10 years, selected from 116 children screened for eligibility. Assessments were performed at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1), and 12 months (T2). Outcomes included muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS), joint mobility (goniometry), and gross motor function (GMFM-88). Longitudinal changes were assessed using the Friedman test, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc pairwise comparisons between T0–T1, T0–T2, and T1–T2. Associations were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Results: Significant longitudinal differences were observed across the evaluated outcomes (overall Friedman tests, p < 0.0001). Median MAS scores decreased from 3 at T0 to 2 at T2 across the evaluated muscle groups. Hip abduction increased, knee extension deficit decreased, and ankle dorsiflexion improved over the study period. GMFM-88 scores also increased longitudinally. Moderate-to-strong associations were observed between muscle spasticity and joint mobility parameters (ρ = −0.881 to 0.682). Conclusions: Favorable longitudinal changes in muscle tone, joint mobility, and gross motor function were observed during participation in the 12-month rehabilitation program. Given the uncontrolled observational design, these changes cannot be attributed exclusively to the rehabilitation intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caimac et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: