Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational study uncovers early transcriptomic instability during epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer cell models, suggesting dynamical analysis predicts treatment-driven state shifts.
Background: Understanding transcriptomic state-transition dynamics is important for elucidating cancer progression and therapeutic response, yet existing single-cell transcriptomic approaches primarily characterize gene-expression changes or pseudotemporal ordering rather than the dynamical organization of cellular-state progression. Methods: We developed a nonlinear dynamical systems framework that reconstructs transcriptomic state spaces from single-cell RNA-sequencing data by integrating diffusion pseudotime, data-driven observable selection, Takens-inspired delay-coordinate reconstruction, nonlinear dynamical analysis, trajectory-aware bootstrap uncertainty estimation, and a novel Transcriptomic Dynamical Instability Score (TDIS). The framework was evaluated using the GSE147405 epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition dataset, with complementary external analysis using the GSE149428 treatment-response dataset. Results: At the prespecified 120-bin resolution, TDIS values differed among treatments (EGF = 0.778, TNF = 0.657, TGFβ1 = 0.091); however, sensitivity analyses demonstrated that both absolute scores and treatment ordering depended on pseudotime discretization. TDIS is therefore interpreted as a resolution-dependent comparative descriptor rather than a resolution-invariant biological ranking. Local TDIS preceded the detected onset of held-out composite EMT-associated transcriptional remodeling with robust bootstrap support for EGF and TNF, whereas the temporal ordering under TGFβ1 was uncertain, demonstrating treatment-dependent pseudotemporal early-warning behavior. Complementary external analysis demonstrated a strong association between transcriptomic trajectory geometry and experimentally measured treatment response. Conclusions: These findings support nonlinear dynamical systems analysis as a complementary systems-level framework for quantifying relative transcriptomic dynamical instability, characterizing transcriptomic state-transition dynamics, and investigating treatment-dependent cellular-state reorganization in cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: