Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates superior angle-tracking accuracy in marine hydraulic ramps, highlighting robust disturbance rejection without increasing control effort.
Marine hydraulic ramps exhibit pronounced nonlinear behavior arising from configuration-dependent transmission geometry, gravitational torque, and servovalve flow–pressure coupling. Accurate angle regulation is further complicated by external disturbances and unavailable internal states. This study develops a nonlinear extended state observer (NLESO)-assisted backstepping control strategy for marine hydraulic-ramp angle regulation. A coupled mechanical–hydraulic model is formulated while retaining the nonlinear transmission geometry, rotational dynamics of the ramp, and hydraulic-actuator dynamics. When only the ramp angle is measured, the local distinguishability between the physical load pressure and the lumped mechanical disturbance is examined to establish a structural basis for their joint reconstruction. A fourth-order NLESO is then developed to reconstruct the angular velocity, load pressure, and lumped disturbance, and the resulting estimates are incorporated into an estimated-state backstepping controller. A Lyapunov-based analysis establishes sufficient conditions for bounded observation errors and boundedness of the observer–controller cascade. Comparative simulations with cascaded feedforward proportional–integral–derivative control, linear active disturbance-rejection control, and linear-ESO-based backstepping control show that the proposed method yields smaller angle-tracking errors under the considered operating conditions. The observer comparison further shows improved reconstruction of the mechanical motion states and a lower average disturbance-estimation error, while revealing a channel-dependent trade-off in load-pressure estimation. Overall, the proposed method enhances closed-loop tracking and disturbance rejection without a substantial increase in RMS control effort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: