Key result
Head-up tilt testing with venepuncture yields ~94% sensitivity for evoking syncope in susceptible patients.
Why the study?
Does a sequential HUT testing protocol including venepuncture improve diagnostic sensitivity in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope?
Observational (n=106)
Does a sequential HUT testing protocol including venepuncture improve diagnostic sensitivity in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope?
Absolute Event Rate: 94.4% vs 58%
p-value: p=<0.01
Implementation of venepuncture in sequential head-up tilt testing protocols increases diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in patients with a history of venepuncture-associated vasovagal syncope.
May support venepuncture-augmented tilt testing in select patients; extends prior observations but leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head-up tilt (HUT) testing is a widely used diagnostic tool in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, no gold standard exists for this examination and the various protocols used have a limited sensitivity and specificity. Our aim was to determine the sensitivity of a sequential HUT testing protocol including venepuncture (VP) and sublingual nitroglycerin application. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the diagnostic gain of a sequential HUT testing protocol including VP applied 10 min after the start of HUT testing and sublingual application of nitroglycerin 20 min after the start of the test protocol in 106 patients with a final diagnosis of VVS. The sensitivity of the test protocol was compared between patients with positive and negative history for VP induced VVS. RESULTS: Overall, pre-syncope or syncope occurred in 68 patients (64.2%). Only 17% of all patients fainted spontaneously within 10 min of passive HUT. Another 39.6% fainted within 20 min. Application of nitroglycerin after 20 min of HUT evoked syncope in another 7.5% until the end of 45 min of HUT. The sensitivity of the test protocol for evoking (pre-)syncope was 94.4% in patients with a positive history for VP associated VVS and 58% in patients with a negative history (P < 0.01**); 85.7% of patients with a positive history and 42.9% of patients with a negative history fainted within 20 min of HUT testing (P < 0.01**). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of VP in sequential HUT testing protocols allows the sensitivity of HUT testing to be increased, especially in patients with a positive history for VP associated VVS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Humm et al. (2014) conducted an observational in suspected vasovagal syncope (n=106). Positive history for venepuncture associated VVS vs. Negative history for venepuncture associated VVS was evaluated on Sensitivity of the test protocol for evoking (pre-)syncope (p=<0.01). A head-up tilt testing protocol including venepuncture showed 94.4% sensitivity for evoking syncope in patients with a history of venepuncture-associated syncope vs 58% in those without (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: