This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Machangqing Cu-Mo deposit is situated in the in western Yunnan (southwest China), which is tectonically located in the NW-trending Jinshajiang-Ailaoshan fold belt. The Cu-Mo vein mineralization is developed in altered wall rocks, associated with the Machangqing granite porphyry. Wall rock alterations include propylitic, phyllic, and potassic, and the alteration/mineralization veining comprises four major stages (I to IV): (I) pre-ore barren quartz; (II) early-ore quartz-sulfide (chalcopyrite + pyrite); (III) late-ore quartz-polymetallic (chalcopyrite + molybdenite + pyrite) sulfide; (IV) post-ore quartz-calcite. Four types of fluid inclusions (FIs) were recognized: liquid-rich two-phase (L-type), vapor-rich two-phase (V-type), hypersaline (H-type), and trace pure vapor (P-type). FI microthermometry suggests that the pre-ore (stage I) fluids were of relatively high temperature (375–510 °C) and salinity (48.2–62.8 wt% NaCl eqv.), with lithostatic pressure of 208–508 bars (eqv. 0.6–1.6 km depth); Fluid temperature may have decreased from syn -ore stage II (405 °C) to stage III (250 °C) fluids, with hydrostatic pressure of ∼100 bars (eqv. 0.9 km depth). Fluids obtained during the post-ore phase (stage IV) exhibited the minimum temperature (below 234 °C) and salinity (ranging from 1.1 to 3.2 wt% NaCl eqv.), indicating meteoric water incursion. We suggest that the stage I alteration occurred under alkaline and highly-oxidized fluid conditions (pH = 6.4–7.7; log f O 2 = -25.4 to –23.8), whereas stage II and III occurred under acidic and less oxidizing conditions (pH = 3.5–4.2; log f O 2 = -30.1 to −27.2). The ore fluid source may have transitioned from magmatic to meteoric, as evidenced by hydrogen–oxygen isotopes, whilst sulfur isotope compositions indicate a deep-seated magmatic source. We suggest that the Cu-Mo ore deposition at Machangqing deposit was triggered by decompression boiling, meteoric water incursion, and the consequent redox change at shallow (∼1 km) depth.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: