Key result
Combining tissue velocity strain with contrast-WMS fails to improve CAD diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
The feasibility and diagnostic value of combining deformation analysis with contrast-enhanced wall motion scoring during dobutamine stress echocardiography were uncertain.
Does combining tissue velocity imaging-based strain measurement with contrast-enhanced wall motion scoring improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography?
Observational (n=60)
Does combining tissue velocity imaging-based strain measurement with contrast-enhanced wall motion scoring improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 82% vs 78%
Adding tissue velocity imaging-based strain measurement to contrast-enhanced wall motion scoring during dobutamine stress echocardiography is feasible but does not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease.
Strain addition to contrast-WMS offers no accuracy gain in dobutamine stress echocardiography; leaves open whether advanced imaging improves CAD detection.
BACKGROUND: The combination of deformation analysis with conventional wall motion scoring (WMS) has been shown to increase the diagnostic sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). The feasibility and diagnostic power of WMS is largely improved by contrast agents; however, they are not used in combination with deformation analysis, as contrast agents are generally considered to render strain measurement unfeasible. AIMS: To assess the feasibility of tissue velocity (TVI)- and 2D speckle tracking (ST)-based strain analysis during contrast-enhanced DSE; and to show whether there is an incremental value in combining deformation analysis with contrast-enhanced WMS. METHODS: DS echocardiograms containing native, tissue Doppler, and contrast-enhanced loops of 60 patients were analysed retrospectively. The feasibility of WMS, TVI-, and ST-strain measurement was determined in 40 patients according to pre-defined criteria. The diagnostic ability of a combined protocol integrating data from contrast-WMS and TVI-strain measurement was then compared with contrast-WMS alone in all 60 patients, using coronary angiograms as a gold standard. RESULTS: Both TVI- and ST-based strain analysis were feasible during contrast-DSE (feasibility at peak stress: 87 and 75%). At the patient level, the diagnostic accuracy of the combined method did not prove superior to contrast-WMS (82 vs. 78%); a trend towards improved sensitivity and specificity for detecting coronary artery disease in the right coronary artery circulation (sensitivity: 85 vs. 77%, P = NS; specificity: 96 vs. 94%) was, however, observed. CONCLUSION: Both TVI- and ST-based myocardial deformation analysis are feasible during contrast-enhanced DSE, however, our results fail to demonstrate a clear diagnostic benefit of additional strain analysis over expert WMS alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagy et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=60). Combined protocol integrating contrast-WMS and TVI-strain measurement vs. Contrast-WMS alone was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease. Combining contrast-enhanced wall motion scoring with tissue velocity strain measurement did not improve diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease compared to contrast-WMS alone (82% vs. 78%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: