Key result
GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is reduce MACE ~12% vs placebo in T2D, independent of BP and weight reductions.
Why the study?
The impact of systolic blood pressure or body weight reduction on cardiovascular event reduction during treatment with GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is for type 2 diabetes was unclear.
Do GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is reduce cardiovascular events independent of reductions in systolic blood pressure and body weight in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Meta-Analysis (n=94,727)
Do GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is reduce cardiovascular events independent of reductions in systolic blood pressure and body weight in adults with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.92)
GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is reduce cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes independently of their effects on systolic blood pressure and body weight.
GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is reduce CV events in T2D independent of BP/weight effects; confirms benefits beyond these mediators in meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION: The impact of reduction of systolic blood pressure or body weight on reduction of cardiovascular events during the treatment with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) for type 2 diabetes is unclear. METHODS: We searched Embase and PubMed. We performed meta-analysis using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect size stratified by drug class on six endpoints of interest, which were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular death (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause death (ACD). We performed meta-regression to assess the difference between GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is, and the impact of reduction of systolic blood pressure or body weight on reduction of cardiovascular events. RESULTS: = 0.004). GLP-1RAs reduced stroke by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93) whereas SGLT2is did not reduce stroke (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82-1.12). GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is similarly reduced MACE by 12%, CVD by 15%, MI by 9%, and ACD by 13%. The effects of systolic blood pressure reduction and body weight reduction on the logarithms of HRs of GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is vs. placebo as for reducing six endpoints of interest were not statistically significant (β ranged from - 0.145 to 0.269, and P ranged from 0.211 to 0.941). CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is lead to similar benefits on MACE, CVD, MI, and ACD in adults with type 2 diabetes. The benefit from SGLT2is on HHF is greater than that from GLP-1RAs, while GLP-1RAs vs. placebo significantly reduce stroke whereas SGLT2is do not. The two drug classes reduce cardiovascular events independent of reductions of systolic blood pressure and body weight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes (n=94,727). GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is vs. Placebo was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.92). GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 12% (HR 0.88) compared to placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes, independent of reductions in systolic blood pressure and body weight.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: