This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective To evaluate the characteristics of geographic atrophy (GA) in Korean patients, including incidence, phenotypes, progression patterns, and factors associated with progression rates. Design Retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Participants Korean patients with intermediate and advanced (prevalent GA) dry AMD, followed for ≥3 years. Methods GA incidence was defined as the percentage of new GA emerging from the intermediate dry AMD group during the follow-up. Baseline phenotypes were evaluated in the prevalent GA group at the initial visit using fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Progression patterns were assessed by growth rates (mm 2 /year and mm/year using square-root treansformation [SQRT]), and the centripetal growth direction (foveal involvement of extrafoveal lesions). Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with progression rates. Results In intermediate dry AMD group (395 eyes/241 patients), GA incidence was 6.8%, while wet conversion was 14.4%, during 60.5 ± 13.5 months. In prevalent GA group (70 eyes/46 patients), the mean lesion size was 7.2 ± 7.1 mm 2 (2.4 ± 1.3 mm [SQRT]), with bilateral involvement in 68.6%, banded/diffuse FAF patterns in 81.4%, extrafoveal and multifocal locations in 51.4% and 84.3%, and drusen and reticular pseudodrusen in 87.1% and 34.3%. The progression rate was 2.0 ± 1.3 mm 2 /year (0.3 ± 0.2 mm/year [SQRT]), with 69.4% exhibiting centripetal direction during 61.2 ± 14.5 months. Large lesion size, banded/diffuse FAF patterns, and extrafoveal locations were positively associated with progression rates ( p = 0.006, 0.007, and 0.008). Conclusions The 5-year incidence of GA in Korean patients with intermediate dry AMD was 6.8%, approximately half of the rate of wet conversion. The mean GA progression rate was 2.0 mm 2 /year (0.3 mm/year [SQRT]). Risk factors for fast progression were banded/diffuse FAF patterns, extrafoveal locations, and large lesion size.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: