This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: In Japan, cervical cancer screening consists of a cytology examination performed once every 2 years. We verified whether the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 disease or higher (CIN3+) was equivalent to that of cytology negative cases (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy [NILM]) for patients with a cytological diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US)" who tested negative for human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS: ). The statistical analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: cases. CONCLUSION: cases was sufficiently low, compared with that of the NILM cases, we considered it reasonable and safe to perform HPV triage for ASC-US cases and to allow HPV-negative cases to return for their next screening in 2 years, which is the same follow-up schedule as that for NILM cases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saitoh et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: