Key result
Despite guidelines, ~21% of otolaryngologists continue ordering preoperative coagulation screening for patients without bleeding risk.
Cross-Sectional (n=130)
Yes
A significant proportion of otolaryngologists continue to order preoperative coagulation screening prior to adenotonsillectomy in patients without bleeding risks, indicating a discrepancy with consensus guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistent guideline-discordant preoperative testing may increase costs without benefit; leaves open effective de-implementation strategies in otolaryngology.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the current practice of pediatric otolaryngologists on a national level and general otolaryngologists on a regional level regarding preoperative coagulation screening prior to adenotonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A five-question survey of members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) and the Massachusetts Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (MSO-HNS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Surveys results were analyzed to determine current preoperative screening practices relative to awareness of screening recommendations published in the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) 1999 Clinical Indicators Compendium. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 27 percent (54/190) and 29 percent (76/260) for MSO-HNS and ASPO members, respectively. In patients with no known bleeding risk, 21 percent of respondents continue to obtain coagulation screening including, at a minimum, a partial thromboplastin time and a prothrombin time. MSO-HNS respondents reported ordering more preoperative coagulation studies than did ASPO respondents (35% vs 10%). Interestingly awareness of the AAO-HNS consensus statement was similar between the two groups and did not impact screening practices. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results indicate a discrepancy between current practice relative to pre-adenotonsillectomy coagulation screening and the recommendations of the AAO-HNS 1999 consensus statement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wieland et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Preoperative coagulation screening prior to adenotonsillectomy (n=130). Preoperative coagulation screening practices vs. MSO-HNS vs ASPO respondents was evaluated on Proportion of respondents who continue to obtain coagulation screening in patients with no known bleeding risk. Despite consensus recommendations, 21% of surveyed otolaryngologists continue to obtain preoperative coagulation screening in patients with no known bleeding risk, with higher rates among general versus pediatric specialists (35% vs 10%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: