Key result
Central venous pressure monitoring extends to routine surgical procedures in conscious patients under spinal anesthesia.
May support CVP feasibility in awake spinal cases; leaves open safety and outcome benefits without higher-level evidence.
CENTRAL venous pressure monitoring has in recent years received attention as a guide in determining the relationship between venous return and ventricular output, that is, as an indicator of myocardial competence.1Subject to careful interpretation in dynamic situations, this type of monitoring provides information that enables the judicious physician to apply proper therapy to his patient's fluid losses, as well as to problems with a cardiogenic origin.2Although central venous pressure monitoring is not the sole source of such information, it has become an adjunct that is highly recommended for surgical and medical patients with problems of hypotension, hypovolemia, circulatory failure, and massive fluid replacement need. The recent introduction of a new device that makes insertion of the central venous catheter very easy3has led us to extend this form of monitoring into situations not previously investigated extensively, especially to more routine surgical procedures performed on conscious
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Constance L. Graves (1968) studied Routine spinal anesthesia. Central venous pressure monitoring was evaluated. Central venous pressure monitoring was extended to routine surgical procedures performed on conscious patients under spinal anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: