Key result
Spinal anesthesia with 4 or 5 ml bupivacaine yields greater cephalad spread than 3 ml.
Why the study?
The effect of different doses of plain 0.5% bupivacaine on the spread of spinal anaesthesia at the LIV-V interspace in orthopaedic patients was not well characterized.
Does a higher volume (4 ml or 5 ml) of 0.5% bupivacaine increase the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia compared to 3 ml in orthopaedic patients?
Does a higher volume (4 ml or 5 ml) of 0.5% bupivacaine increase the cephalad spread of spinal anaesthesia compared to 3 ml in orthopaedic patients?
Higher volumes (4-5 ml) of 0.5% bupivacaine provide greater cephalad spread of analgesia compared to 3 ml, though all volumes achieved satisfactory anaesthesia for lower extremity surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support volume titration for targeted spread in spinal anesthesia; leaves open optimal dosing confirmation in larger trials.
Spinal anaesthesia with 3 ml, 4 ml or 5 ml of plain 0.5% bupivacaine was performed in three groups of 20 orthopaedic (ASA 1) patients at the LIV-V interspace. Patients aged less than 20 years or more than 60 years and those outside the normal range of body mass index were excluded. The spread of analgesia was greater in the 4-ml and 5-ml groups compared to the 3-ml group at each testing time (P less than 0.05). The mean maximum cephalad spread of pinprick analgesia (+/- s.d.) 60 min after injection was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in the 4-ml group (T10 +/- 3.2) and in the 5-ml group (T10 +/- 2.7) than in the 3-ml group (T12 +/- 2.1). The interindividual variability of the cephalad spread of analgesia was greater in the 4-ml and 5-ml groups compared to the 3-ml group (P less than 0.05). The degree of motor block was higher in the 5-ml group than in the 3- and 4-ml groups at 5 and 15 min after injection. In seven patients the first sign of motor block was the patient's inability to flex the ankle, rather than inability to raise an extended leg as was the case in the other patients. In all patients satisfactory anaesthesia for surgery of the lower extremity was achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taivainen et al. (1989) studied Orthopaedic surgery requiring spinal anaesthesia (n=60). Plain 0.5% bupivacaine vs. 3 ml plain 0.5% bupivacaine was evaluated on mean maximum cephalad spread of pinprick analgesia 60 min after injection (p=<0.05). Spinal anaesthesia with 4 ml or 5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine resulted in a significantly higher mean maximum cephalad spread of analgesia (T10) compared to 3 ml (T12) at 60 minutes (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: