Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 16, 2008AnaesthesiaOpen Access

The extension of epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section: a survey of current UK practice*

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

UK survey finds ~68% administer full epidural extension doses in delivery rooms alongside adverse incidents.

  • n=209

Why the study?

The conversion of epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for emergency Caesarean section has important medical and medicolegal implications, but current UK management practices were unclear.

Population

Lead obstetric anaesthetists in all UK maternity units with 209 respondents

Comparison

Current management practices for extending epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section

Design

Postal questionnaire survey

Authors

KRKathryn ReganBoston UniversityGOG. O’SullivanNational Health Service

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Variation in epidural extension practice may compromise safety during transfer; leaves open the need for standardized protocols and prospective studies.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=209)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
209 lead obstetric anaesthetists from maternity units across the UK surveyed on current management for extending epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section.
E
Exposure
Survey on current management practices for extending epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section
O
Outcome
Current management practices including location of top-up, agents used, monitoring during transfer, and adverse incidents

A UK survey reveals significant variation in practice and a lack of monitoring during patient transfer when extending epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section, highlighting potential safety concerns.

Cite This Study

Regan et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Emergency Caesarean section (n=209). Current management for extending epidural blockade was evaluated. A survey of 209 UK maternity units found that 68% administer the full local anaesthetic dose in the delivery room, while 33 respondents reported 43 adverse incidents associated with epidural extension.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa925fe9965218ad462dff5https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05319.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A national survey of obstetric anaesthetic handovers*2006 · 41 citations
  2. 2Urgency of caesarean section: A new classification2000 · 468 citations
  3. 3Up, up and away: watching the Caesarean section rate rise2002 · 5 citations