Key result
Only ~23% of final-year Brazilian medical students achieve satisfactory scores on CPR guidelines.
Cross-Sectional (n=217)
Yes
Final-year medical students in Brazil demonstrated low knowledge of the 2010 CPR guidelines, highlighting a significant gap in medical education.
May compromise resuscitation readiness in new physicians; leaves open whether curriculum reforms improve long-term guideline mastery.
Introduction Sudden death is a substantial public health problem, representing a major cause of mortality worldwide. Suitable initial care is essential for a good prognosis of these patients. Objectives To assess the knowledge of the 2010 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among medical students in their final year of undergraduate training. Methods This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 217 medical students enrolled in the sixth year of accredited medical schools in Brazil. A structured questionnaire with 27 items was used to record the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants and to assess their knowledge base of the 2010 ILCOR guidelines for CPR. Results Only fifty (23.04%) out of 217 students achieved results considered as satisfactory in the written evaluation. The average score obtained was 56.74% correct answers. Seventeen percent of the students had never performed CPR maneuvers and 83.80% had never performed cardioversion or defibrillation. Conclusions The knowledge base of medical students regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation is low. Considering these medical students are in their final year of medical school, this study reveals a worrisome scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moura et al. (2016) reported a cross-sectional. 2010 ILCOR guidelines for CPR knowledge assessment was evaluated on Satisfactory results in the written evaluation. Only 23.04% of final-year Brazilian medical students achieved satisfactory results on a written evaluation of 2010 CPR guidelines, with an average score of 56.74%.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: