This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) is a significant challenge for preterm infants, particularly those born before 29 weeks of gestation. Prolonged MV is associated with adverse respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Extubation failure (EF) remains common, with ˃67% of preterm infants failing initial attempts. This study aimed to identify predictors of EF and develop a practical extubation readiness model. Methods: This case–control study included preterm infants born before 33 weeks of gestation. Infants were categorized into EF ( n = 27) and extubation success ( n = 81) groups, matched for gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), sex, and admission month. Pre- and postextubation variables, including ventilator settings, blood gas measurements, and comorbidities were analyzed. Logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses identified predictors and characterized EF timing. Results: Lower preextubation fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) (0.27 vs. 0.32, P < 0.05) and mean airway pressure (MAP) (8.05 vs. 8.44 cmH 2 O, P = 0.052) were associated with successful extubation. EF was associated with higher mortality (26% vs. 7%, P = 0.01) and severe broncho-pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (22% vs. 4%, P < 0.002). A three-variable model (surfactant use, FiO 2 , and MAP) achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77. Most reintubations (59%) occurred within 24 h, with higher BW and GA associated with delayed reintubation. Conclusion: Lower FiO 2 and MAP before extubation were predictive of successful extubation, whereas EF was associated with higher mortality and severe BPD. This three-variable model offers practical utility in assessing extubation readiness. Further research should standardize the extubation criteria and explore the integration of advanced technologies to support decision-making.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altirkawi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: