Key result
Non-robotic thoracoscopic ASD closure achieves 100% procedural success with no mortality in beating or arrested hearts.
Why the study?
To characterize the mid and long-term clinical outcomes of atrial septal defect closure using MTCST without robotic system assistance.
Does minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery without robotic assistance on a beating heart provide safe and effective closure of secundum-type atrial septal defects compared to an arrested heart approach?
Cohort (n=856)
No
Does minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery without robotic assistance on a beating heart provide safe and effective closure of secundum-type atrial septal defects compared to an arrested heart approach?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Thoracoscopic closure of secundum-type atrial septal defects without robotic assistance is safe and effective, with no in-hospital mortality or residual shunts, whether performed on a beating or arrested heart.
Supports non-robotic thoracoscopic ASD closure on beating heart; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of long-term outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the mid and long-term clinical outcomes of 856 atrial septal defect cases that underwent closure using MTCST without the assistance of a robotic system. METHODS: From June 2009 to September 2023, a total of 856 cases at our center underwent selective repair of a secundum-type atrial septal defect using MTCST without Da Vinci robotic assistance. According to whether the operation was performed during an arrested heart or not, patients were divided into arrested heart group (n = 110) and beating heart group (n = 746). Cardiopulmonary bypass was established peripherally. Three-port incisions in the right chest were conducted first, followed by a pericardiotomy, superior and inferior vena cava snaring, atriotomy, and the closure of atrial septal defect under a thoracoscope. Patients were followed up from 3 months to 12 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The exclusively MTCST for atrial septal defect closure was successfully performed without any in-hospital mortality in both groups. None of the procedures required an alternative technique for the closure. There were significant learning curves for cardiopulmonary bypass time and operation time. No residual shunt was observed in all patients during the follow-up transthoracic echocardiography at 5-day and 3-month timepoints postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an exclusively MTCST for atrial septal defect repair is safe, simple, and minimally invasive. Exclusively MTCST is a new desirable alternative beside robotic-assisted atrial septal defect repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Secundum-type atrial septal defect (n=856). MTCST on beating heart vs. MTCST on arrested heart was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Totally thoracoscopic closure of atrial septal defects using MTCST without robotic assistance achieved 100% procedural success with zero in-hospital mortality in both beating and arrested heart groups.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: