Surveillance study reveals substantial declines in opportunistic illness rates among children with HIV, highlighting the sustained benefits of modern antiretroviral therapy.
BACKGROUND: Among children with HIV infection, opportunistic illness (OI) rates decreased after introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 1997. We evaluated whether such decreases have continued. METHODS: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Surveillance System for children with HIV living in the US during 1997-2016 was used to enumerate infants experiencing the first OI by birth year and OIs among all children <13 years of age (stratified by natality). We calculated the time to first OI among infants using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Among infants born during 1997-2016, 711 first OIs were diagnosed. The percentage of the first OIs diagnosed in successive 5-year birth periods was: 60.0% (1997-2001), 24.6% (2002-2006), 11.3% (2007-2011), and 3.4% (2012-2016). For every OI, the number of first cases decreased nearly annually. Time to first OI increased in successive birth periods. Among children <13 years of age, 2083 OI were diagnosed, including Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, candidiasis, recurrent bacterial infection, wasting syndrome, cytomegalovirus, lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis, tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacteriosis and herpes simplex virus. The rate (#/1000 person-years) decreased overall (60-7.2) and for all individual OIs. Earlier during 1997-2016, rates for all OIs were higher among foreign-born than US-born children but later became similar for all OIs except tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with HIV in the US, numbers and rates of all OIs decreased during 1997-2016. Earlier, OI rates were highest among non-US-born children but were later comparable with those among US-born children for all OIs except tuberculosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nesheim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: