Key result
BTrackS balance protocol demonstrates fair-to-good test-retest reliability across daily, weekly, and monthly intervals.
Why the study?
The modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol for the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) had not yet been evaluated for test-retest reliability across multiple time intervals.
Does the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol demonstrate test-retest reliability across multiple time intervals in healthy young adults?
Observational
Does the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol demonstrate test-retest reliability across multiple time intervals in healthy young adults?
The BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol demonstrates fair-to-good test-retest reliability across multiple time durations in healthy young adults.
Caution against routine clinical use; leaves open validation for broader populations and practice.
BACKGROUND: Postural control is critical for body sway control and is subserved by three sources of sensory feedback (ie, vision, proprioception and vestibulation). A method for determining the relative contribution of each sensory feedback source to postural control is the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance for the balance tracking system (BTrackS). However, this method has not yet been evaluated for test-retest reliability. PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest reliability of the modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol for the BTrackS across multiple time intervals. METHODS: Three groups of healthy young adults performed the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol four times separated by either one day, one week or one month. Within each time duration group, and condition, differences in total center of pressure path length were determined from one test session to the next and intra class correlation coefficient categorizations were made. RESULTS: In all but one case, no significant difference in performance was seen from one testing session to the next. The one significant difference found was a decrease in total center of pressure path length from day 1 to day 2 in the vestibular condition of the group tested daily. Intra class correlation coefficient results largely indicated fair-good reliability across time durations and test conditions. CONCLUSION: The present study largely supports use of the BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol as a means of probing the sensory contributions to balance performance across multiple time durations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goble et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy. BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol was evaluated on Differences in total center of pressure path length and intra class correlation coefficient. The BTrackS modified clinical test of sensory integration and balance protocol demonstrated fair-to-good test-retest reliability across daily, weekly, and monthly intervals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: