This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence optical imaging with indocyanine-green enhancement (FOI) is a new imaging modality for the assessment of hand arthritis. The objective of this study was to compare performance profiles of clinical examination (CE), US and FOI using MRI as a reference in the same active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: CE, US, FOI and MRI were performed on six subjects with active RA. Each sequence of FOI was divided into three phases based on indocyanine-green dynamics and the joints were graded semi-quantitatively. Sensitivities and specificities of CE, US and FOI were calculated using the RAMRIS synovitis score >0 as a reference in a total of 30 joints (the second to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and the wrist of the clinically dominant hand). RESULTS: FOI showed sensitivities and specificities, respectively, of 85% and of 94% for Phase-1 and 69% and 94% for Phase-2. Sensitivities and specificities were 100% and 35% for CE (tender or swollen), 92% and 41% for gray scale US, and 77% and 100% for color-Doppler US. CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics of FOI in detection of synovitis in patients with active RA are comparable to those of US and more specific than CE. FOI has a potential as an assessment modality of RA.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirano et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: