Key result
Multi-task framework achieves ~2.2° average alpha angle error in evaluating developmental hip dysplasia.
Why the study?
Ultrasound measurement of alpha and beta angles for DDH diagnosis is non-trivial for sonographers and requires thorough understanding of complex anatomical structures.
Does the proposed multi-task framework accurately evaluate developmental dysplasia of the hip from ultrasound images?
Does the proposed multi-task framework accurately evaluate developmental dysplasia of the hip from ultrasound images?
The proposed multi-task framework can accurately and robustly automate the evaluation of developmental dysplasia of the hip from ultrasound images.
May aid automated DDH angle measurement in infant hip US; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The ultrasound (US) screening of the infant hip is vital for the early diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The US diagnosis of DDH refers to measuring alpha and beta angles that quantify hip joint development. These two angles are calculated from key anatomical landmarks and structures of the hip. However, this measurement process is not trivial for sonographers and usually requires a thorough understanding of complex anatomical structures. In this study, we propose a multi-task framework to learn the relationships among landmarks and structures jointly and automatically evaluate DDH. Our multi-task networks are equipped with three novel modules. Firstly, we adopt Mask R-CNN as the basic framework to detect and segment key anatomical structures and add one landmark detection branch to form a new multi-task framework. Secondly, we propose a novel shape similarity loss to refine the incomplete anatomical structure prediction robustly and accurately. Thirdly, we further incorporate the landmark-structure consistent prior to ensure the consistency of the bony rim estimated from the segmented structure and the detected landmark. In our experiments, 1231 US images of the infant hip from 632 patients are collected, of which 247 images from 126 patients are tested. The average errors in alpha and beta angles are 2.221∘and 2.899∘. About 93% and 85% estimates of alpha and beta angles have errors less than 5 degrees, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can accurately and robustly realize the automatic evaluation of DDH, showing great potential for clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2021) studied Developmental dysplasia of the hip (n=632). Multi-task framework for automatic evaluation of DDH was evaluated on Average errors in alpha and beta angles. A proposed multi-task framework for automatic evaluation of developmental dysplasia of the hip achieved average errors of 2.221° and 2.899° for alpha and beta angles, respectively.