Key result
Temporary pacing and conservative management enable cardiac recovery in fulminant myocarditis mimicking STEMI.
Case Report (n=1)
Fulminant myocarditis must be included in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with STEMI-like symptoms and ECG findings but normal coronary arteries.
May support temporary pacing in select fulminant myocarditis cases mimicking STEMI; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
The clinical presentation of myocarditis varies widely and can rapidly change or deteriorate, manifesting with symptoms similar to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, such as decreased cardiac output, reduced contractility, sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular (AV) and bundle branch blocks, and various arrhythmias. A previously healthy 50-year-old woman presented with symptoms of an upper respiratory infection followed by acute cardiogenic shock and complete AV block. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed pathological Q waves and ST-segment elevation, raising suspicion for acute myocardial infarction. However, coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries. Following temporary pacemaker insertion and conservative management, her cardiac function recovered. However, right bundle branch block remained as a sequela. In patients presenting with symptoms and ECG findings suggestive of acute myocardial infarction but with normal coronary arteries, fulminant myocarditis must be included in the differential diagnosis. With active life-sustaining treatment, favorable outcomes can be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jo et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Fulminant acute myocarditis mimicking ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=1). Temporary pacemaker insertion and conservative management was evaluated on Cardiac function recovery. Temporary pacemaker insertion and conservative management led to the recovery of cardiac function in a 50-year-old woman with fulminant acute myocarditis mimicking STEMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: