Key result
Machine learning of aortic pressure signals during PCI predicts prolonged NSTEMI stays with ~77% AUC.
Why the study?
Expedited discharge after revascularization for NSTEMI is beneficial, but high-risk patients require longer hospitalization, creating a need to predict prolonged length of stay using aortic pressure wave assessment.
Can a machine learning model using aortic pressure signal features predict prolonged length of stay in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=497)
No
Can a machine learning model using aortic pressure signal features predict prolonged length of stay in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Effect estimate: AUC 77%
Artificial intelligence applied to aortic pressure waveforms during PCI can predict prolonged hospital stay in NSTEMI patients with moderate accuracy.
May support post-PCI risk stratification in NSTEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are typically evaluated using coronary angiography and managed through coronary revascularization. Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of expedited discharge following revascularization in this patient population. However, individuals with concomitant heart failure, hemodynamic instability, or arrhythmias often necessitate prolonged hospitalization. Using aortic pressure (AP) wave assessment, we aim to predict a prolonged length of stay (> 4 days, PLoS) in patients with NSTEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we included 497 patients with NSTEMI [66.3 ± 12.9 years, 37.6 % (187) females]. We developed a predictive model for PLoS using features primarily extracted from the AP signal recorded throughout PCI. We performed feature selection using recursive feature elimination (RFE) with cross-validation and built a machine learning (ML) model using the CatBoost tree-based classifier. The decision-making process of the ML model was analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). RESULTS: We achieved average accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, and receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) values of 77 %, 78 %, 76 %, 67 %, and 77 %, respectively. Using SHAP, we identified the ejection systolic period, ejection systolic time, the difference between systolic blood pressure and dicrotic notch pressure (DesP), the age modified shock index (mSI_age) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) as the most characteristic features extracted from the AP signal. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential of using ML and features extracted from the AP signal to predict PLoS in patients with NSTEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razavi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=497). Machine learning model using aortic pressure (AP) wave assessment was evaluated on Prolonged length of stay (> 4 days) (AUC 77%). A machine learning model using features extracted from the aortic pressure signal during PCI predicted prolonged length of stay (>4 days) in NSTEMI patients with an AUC of 77%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: