Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
2-Methoxyestradiol (2-ME), an endogenous metabolite of estradiol with no affinity for estrogen receptors, is a potent anticarcinogenic agent (in phase II clinical trials) and mediates the inhibitory effects of estradiol on smooth muscle cell (SMC) growth. Here we studied the intracellular mechanisms by which 2-ME inhibits SMC growth and whether 2-ME prevents injury-induced neointima formation. 2-ME concentrations that inhibit proliferation of cycling human aortic SMCs by >or=50% blocked cell-cycle progression in G(0)/G(1) and in G(2)/M phase, as determined by flow cytometry. Consistent with the cell-cycle effects, at a molecular level (Western blots), 2-ME inhibited cyclin D(1) and cyclin B(1) expression; cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)-1 and cdk-2 activity; and retinoblastoma protein (pRb), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, and Akt phosphorylation. 2-ME also upregulated the Cdk inhibitor p27 and interfered with tubulin polymerization. Moreover, 2-ME augmented COX-2 expression, suggesting that it may also inhibit SMC growth via prostaglandin formation. In rats, treatment with 2-ME abrogated injury-induced neointima formation; decreased proliferating SMCs; downregulated expression of proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), c-myc, cyclin D(1), cyclin B(1), phosphorylated Akt, phosphorylated ERK1/2, p21, and pRb; inhibited cdk-1 and cdk-4 activity; and upregulated expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and p27. Caspase-3 cleavage assay and fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) analysis showed no evidence of apoptosis in 2-ME-treated SMCs, and TUNEL staining in carotid segments showed no evidence of 2-ME-induced apoptosis in vivo. The antimitotic effects of 2-ME on SMCs are mediated by the inhibition of key cell-cycle regulatory proteins and effects on tubulin polymerization and COX-2 upregulation. These effects of 2-ME most likely contribute to the antivasoocclusive actions of this endogenous compound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barchiesi et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: